Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruce Whitcomb's avatar

And agreed here too. No, I haven't given up hope for a better future by a long shot and then some. The world and its inhabitants are by and large on the side of what's good for humanity and the planet. We all have to continue to believe and push for this. Good does always eventually persevere over evil. It's the "eventually" that we always need to be aware of and the few bad eggs that could care less about the process of being alive than what they'll never be able to take with them when they finally leave the planet. I think from my vantage- two things are going on. 1. We're older and have seen much more up close as adults over the years since our more idyllic youth, and yet 2. The times in which we came up- at least seemed to be filled with way more honesty and integrity than the myriad aberrations we are bombarded with today and the number of folks gaming the system leaving the rest of us mum about it or numb to it- or both. I know this goes way beyond trusting AI intentions, but hey, it's all related, non? Nonetheless, Gary- hope springs eternal. And WILL WIN.

Bruce Whitcomb's avatar

Gusher---

Incredibly beautifully written my friend.

I cant remember our age difference- perhaps 10 years(?), but it's like Mikey B. said to himself about apprehension before a gig, "Can I do this? Might I forget how to do it?" And then he dismissed it as that common fear we all face to some small degree before going on a stage and having to prove to the public why we're on that stage to begin with. He dismissed it through the knowledge that "its all there" all up in that cranium. It never goes away. I'm saying that even with our age difference, and perhaps because of it, I cant help but fully agree that all of our knowledge gleaned over our lives at every age is still there. Maybe slightly slower or circuitous routes take us there, but it's all there and it gets complied in larger amounts every year. And with AI, one cant help but realistically imagine that medical advances plus information advances of all kinds could in fact supply us with an all new view and experience on what reality can be for us.

AI does hold immense promise, yet my worry is validated by the fact that anything that is powerful can and will be abused for short sighted purposes by short sighted humans. On FB alone, about a year ago I started getting super inundated by ads for erectile disfunction pills- all different

"products"- quotation marks because I dont think real products existed. All these ads had fake AI videos with Barbara O'Neil, erectile disfunction and wholistic medicine guru touting why you should buy XYZ. Again, if you followed these ads to the end, every ad took you to a different named med at various prices, but supposedly every product was the "One and only magic formula that you need- and accept no substitutes". Tell me- that alone isn't a dead give away? My first question was- why me? Were others being targeted with these unrelenting phony requests for their real money? An internet search proved that such phony ads do indeed exist on various social media networks, yet these ads STILL persisted on FB for quite a while after my discovery- leading to the question- why is FB allowing this shit to persist? So I posted a very angry heads up about Zuckedberg being complicit in this. He had to be for the amount of time it continued to go "unchecked". I mean the ad dollars gleaned from this activity over months would only have to be fairly monumental, non? Soon thereafter I get a "friend request" from Zuckerberg himself- yes with his picture on it. At this point I didn't want to have any involvement with "him" or something AI version of him, but I continued to post my disrespect pointed at him for allowing this shit to continue. Eventually the ED ads disappeared from my feed.

This is only the tip of the iceberg though. We now daily see "feel good" posts of Paul McCartney and Bob Dylan visiting Willy Nelson on his death bed in a hospital. Or Rachel Maddow teaming up with Steven Colbert to create a new news outlet. Again- all AI images touting falsities--- AIMED AT WHOM? AND TO WHAT END? If you look at the comments, some of them seem so "God bless you for all the work you do..." that they too appear rather canned- and all these posts are internet search proven false stories. So who are the authors, and just WTF are they up to? And why should we be asked to Follow them??? This is where AI and I have a really discrepancy on valid purpose and predatory practices over a technology that can truly help mankind.

I too only hope that in the correct hands and with the purpose of elevating the common good, AI does hold immeasurable promise for the common man. However, my experience so far- at least in the social media realm- has been exceedingly questionable to that end. Too, with Mark Zuckerberg's and Elon Musk's allegiance to Trump on full display, I agree that any technology advance comes promise- but only if used in the correct hands. There are those I feel are currently obviously using AI under false pretenses and publiclally subversive ways. Their posts certainly deserve the label of being "fake news", and with DT probably being the biggest noise maker about fake news, and his being the most blatant and publically famous projector of falsities on others---

All of this fake AI crap so far-

ain't so good.

💩💩💩🧐

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?